Increased Validation of Medical Prescriptions by Pharmaceutical Retail Leadership: a case report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37497/ijhmreview.v9i00.328Keywords:
Validation, Digital Signature, Electronic Prescription, DrugstoresAbstract
Objective: Make the process of accessing and validating digitally signed medical prescriptions more agile, as each platform has its particularity, bringing great difficulty in access, expertise, and agility in handling systems for Pharmacies.
Method: The information technology area of the pharmaceutical retail company studied in this article centralized the main electronic addresses on a single web page. The assimilation of digital signature validation training was optimized, allowing counter attendants and/or pharmacists to have greater dexterity in validating signatures. The innovation allowed an analysis of the time spent on the procedure before and after inserting the tool.
Results: The centralization of the access links of the various electronic prescription platforms used to validate the digital signatures of medical prescribers, made accessing the sites faster, making the visualization and validation of prescriptions more agile.
Conclusion: In this way, the customer's shopping experience became more attractive, because the whole process occurs more quickly, bringing the possibility of a greater customer turnover and consequently optimizing service time, making it possible to serve more customers, increasing the number of sales and predisposing to a higher profit margin in pharmaceutical retail.
References
AMMENWERTH, E.; SCHNELL-INDERST, P.; MACHAN, C.; et al. The Effect of Electronic Prescribing on Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, v. 15, n. 5, p. 585–600, 2008.
BUTLER, Stephen F.; BUDMAN, Simon H.; FERNANDEZ, Kathrine; et al. Validation of a screener and opioid assessment measure for patients with chronic pain. PAIN, v. 112, n. 1, p. 65, 2004.
BUYSE, Marc; LOI, Sherene; VAN’T VEER, Laura; et al. Validation and Clinical Utility of a 70-Gene Prognostic Signature for Women With Node-Negative Breast Cancer. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, v. 98, n. 17, p. 1183–1192, 2006.
CLEGG, Andrew; BATES, Chris; YOUNG, John; et al. Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data. Age and Ageing, v. 45, n. 3, p. 353–360, 2016.
GEORGE, Johnson; PHUN, Yee-Teng; BAILEY, Michael J; et al. Development and Validation of the Medication Regimen Complexity Index. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, v. 38, n. 9, p. 1369–1376, 2004.
GORDON, William J.; CATALINI, Christian. Blockchain Technology for Healthcare: Facilitating the Transition to Patient-Driven Interoperability. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, v. 16, p. 224–230, 2018.
JIA, Yue; HARMAN, Mark. An Analysis and Survey of the Development of Mutation Testing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v. 37, n. 5, p. 649–678, 2011.
LALMUANAWMA, Samuel; HUSSAIN, Jamal; CHHAKCHHUAK, Lalrinfela. Applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence for Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic: A review. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, v. 139, p. 110059, 2020.
RODRIGUES, Hugo; CORREIA, Manuel Eduardo; ANTUNES, Luís. A Secure Electronic Prescription System. International Journal for Infonomics, v. 6, n. 3/4, p. 780–787, 2013.
SUTTON, Reed T.; PINCOCK, David; BAUMGART, Daniel C.; et al. An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. npj Digital Medicine, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1–10, 2020.
Effect of Electronic Prescribing on Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic Review | Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | Oxford Academic. Disponível em: <https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article/15/5/585/732256#google_vignette>. Acesso em: 18 fev. 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Wesley Nelo da Silva, Chennyfer Dobbins Abi Rached, Márcia Mello Costa De Liberal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: The author(s) authorize the publication of the text in the journal; The author(s) guarantee that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not in the process of being evaluated by any other journal(s); The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas, and concepts contained in the texts, as these are the sole responsibility of their respective author(s); The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text in order to ensure that it adheres to the standards of the journal. Authors retain the copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the article with the acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g. publication in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with the acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal webpage) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html)